DHS Strips Harvard of International Student Privileges Over National Security Allegations

Why Did DHS Revoke Harvard’s SEVP Certification?

In a bombshell move with global repercussions, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoked Harvard University’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) on May 22, 2025. The action effectively halts Harvard’s ability to enroll or maintain international students on F-1 and J-1 visas for the 2025–2026 academic year.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem cited allegations that Harvard “fostered antisemitic and pro-terrorist conduct” and engaged in improper coordination with the Chinese Communist Party, referencing research partnerships and training programs.

Harvard Accused of Ties to Foreign Entities, Antisemitism

In its formal complaint, the Department of Homeland Security accused Harvard of permitting “anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators” to assault Jewish students. The DHS also claimed the university collaborated with blacklisted Chinese entities such as the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, raising concerns about national security and campus safety.

The order also referenced large foreign donations linked to groups allegedly trying to influence U.S. academia—a charge that places Harvard at the center of a growing debate on foreign influence in American higher education.

Harvard Fights Back in Federal Court

In a swift response, Harvard University filed suit in U.S. District Court in Boston on May 23, calling the DHS decision “arbitrary and capricious.” The university argues the action violates both due-process rights and First Amendment protections.

Judge William G. Young responded within hours, granting a preliminary injunction that temporarily preserves Harvard’s SEVP status, allowing over 6,700 international students to remain enrolled while litigation unfolds.

Impact on International Students and Global Education

Among those in limbo are students like Yu-hsuan Lin from Taiwan, who had secured both admission and a visa. “I feel helpless,” she told Reuters, uncertain whether to defer or consider universities in Europe or the United Kingdom.

According to Taiwan’s Ministry of Education, at least 52 Taiwanese students could be impacted if the injunction is lifted.

Higher education experts warn this action could damage the $44 billion international education market in the U.S. Many international students pay full tuition, indirectly subsidizing American students through financial aid programs.

“This sends a chilling message to universities nationwide,” said Robert Kelchen, professor at the University of Tennessee. “It could drive top global talent to institutions abroad.”

What This Means for U.S. Universities and Foreign Policy

Harvard President Claudine Gay called the DHS move “unlawful and retaliatory,” noting that international students make up 27% of Harvard’s student body. She emphasized their critical role in the school’s global research leadership.

The decision also raises questions about U.S. foreign policy, academic freedom, and the autonomy of higher-education institutions. Critics argue that political motivations are interfering with university governance.

The Legal Battle Ahead: Constitutional Rights vs National Security

As the case heads toward a full merits hearing, legal scholars and civil liberties advocates anticipate a landmark battle over how far federal agencies can go in regulating academic institutions.

The outcome could redefine:

• The scope of DHS authority
• The limits of free speech on campus
• The U.S. government’s stance on foreign academic partnerships

Whether this move is a national security safeguard or government overreach, one thing is certain: the fight over Harvard’s SEVP revocation will have ripple effects across the entire landscape of U.S. international education policy.